Видео

Thank you for absolutely being unable to answer the question.

In a world of dumb monkeys, including the pretentious idiot with the glasses, finally I hear someone who knows what he is talking about

Thanks!

Thanks!

If anyone is interested, I’m one of the Few people that has a copy of Emptiness and Fullness in the Lao Tzu by Eugene (Seraphim) Rose. It’s his master thesis and it’s a key reason why this book was written.

Where is the full video ?

Lots of you commenting would do well to listen to/read what is actually being said instead of arguing against or condescendingly hand-waiving away what you think is being said. Good grief.

I have Autism Spectrum Disorder, diagnosed at age 49. I thought for decades it was something else entirely, I thought it was gender Dysphoria actually there’s a high percentage of autistic people who have gender Dysphoria.

Heresy. I see why some Orthodox do not like him.

Total academic speculation. Do you believe the Bible or not? Jesus quoted Genesis 6 times, as historical fact. The NT references Genesis over 180 times, as historical fact (not allegory or myth). Only a fool argues with God and His account.

Gospel of Thomas 29: (29) Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty." "Man got to tell himself he understand." Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Kenneth Kitchen ("On the Reliability of the Old Testament") has some different things from this video to say in terms of the link/reliance/response of Genesis 1 to the creation myths spoken about here. He suggests (much more convincingly imho) that Genesis 1 is older than this video assumes - perhaps 1700BC. In which case it's not responding to those myths because it predates them. To assume Genesis is responding to them because they share some themes is not great scholarship.

Unintentional ASMR ahh

very sad.. Garbage is garbage, if it comes from scientists or saints... God did not use micro-evolution to create anything. Macro-evolution, you say??? I would answer yes... show me where to sign.. As Micro-evolution explains the beauty of the His creations... As God clearly indicated in Genesis. He also did not send Lazarus back to his mother's womb to be recreated after rotting in the grave for 4 days.. He did not say to the born-blind to come back in at least 4-20 weeks, because this is how long it takes for the eyes to form, since he needed new eyes.. he did not say to the cripple at the pond to come back in at least 9-months, because his entire nerve system was shot.. God did not say to the young man who was lowered by his friends that he needs to be reborn, since he is cripple.. God instantaneously created new and functioning eyes for the born-blind, and instantaneously restored Lazarus's rotted flesh, and rebuilt Lazarus's body.. instantaneously restored the nerve systems for those two crippled men.. no time waited.. nothing.. because God can... God does not need time... God is outside of time.. WE NEED TIME ... But God does not.. This is why I believe that God is right, and the book of Genesis got it right.. But we did not.. And clearly our Metropolitan above was dancing around the correct answer and did not witness to His Master..

... Then what would be the point of XC.

Is this Dungeons and Dragons Orthodoxy?

I so enjoy this discussion as someone who constantly wonders how the west lost its spiritual way. I adopted sanatana dharma as my guiding light...and its huge repertoire of terms allows me to appreciate this analysis. Its the closest Ive ever come to understanding liturgy and the eucharist. For me the idea of liturgy as paricipating in all gifts of God...a cosmic event requiring constant, minute by minute renewal is akin to constancy of sadhana and abidance to dharma thatcI understand. I pray this video is kept here, to renew the hope of Christians perplexed by their tradition.

It's been 13 years. Has Francis Collins finally figured out that humans were created and didn't evolve into existence?

Consciousness is only generally form of brain work which is behaving according to quantum mechanism and can linger even after the body is no more.There are bubbles of consciousness in the atmosphere and space and governed by quantum Laws all matter disappears into dark energy and this energy is the supreme consciousness and final authority

You people better study the Buddhist branch of vajrayan and there you will understand that Hinduism is nothing but fabricated from of buddhism.As

I had a sneaky feeling that these questions would lead to God. And by "God" I mean, of course, the god of Israel, not any other !

It’s weird I never really heard anyone mention their first memory where they became aware before besides myself. It was my 4th birthday I remember waking up from a nap and my mom saying everyone would be here soon. Like he said you knew everyone once you saw them but you couldn’t remember them until that moment. Such a bizarre thing to think about and I can still remember it 30+ years later

I love this guy. I’ve learned so much from him. Love his New Testament translation.

💚

😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴

Does anyone else get the impression that Mr Medved just doesn't like Islam much?

God has consciousness but God is not consciousness.

Arrogant

Why are you stealing Robert’s content?

I forget, who is the actor that speak this poetry, the guy with the deep voice just after the very beginning? Eugene or something like that.... I had his recordings but lost them.

Respect to David! And to porcupine tree)))

I want him to study "animal cruelty" from a theological point of view. Do animals feel pain just like us or are they robots with no soul ? What is the point of sacrificing robots ? (Isaiah 1:11)

There's only one thing worse than the arrogance of religious authority and that's the arrogance of "scientists" who write and sell books for corporate publishers

1st of all🥸WE=mc2🤡have to be real😇 people in order to understand personality is a🤥Mask🎭(Persona - Mask😷in🤑Greek)📜perceiving✡️G😎D✝️as☪️a🕉️Real♾️🎺 Royal👑person🏃. Reality exists more fully🌅when⚛️realizing🧐that🐑WE=mc2👪are all👣potentially human🫢mortals☠️to✌️ become♾️Eternal🦸Gods in✡️Faith✝️the ⛽fuel of🫦 no🚀👄tool💋fool😂!

A lot to consider

Ever since AD 70 and the Roman War , the “ebionites’ { ‘’the poor’’ was the name of yeshua s followers ( who were required to hold all their possessions ‘’IN COMMON’’ and it was easier for a camel to pass through a needle then a richman to enter kingdom of heaven) the “Christian’ gentle take over allowed the Rich to keep possession if they pay tithes. Money is God in capitalism.

Its not just that Wright wants to be considered a Christian intellectual its that he wants to be a noticed intellectual, like the little boy always telling adults to “look at me”. Like the child he’s very annoying.

This is why the unbiblical doctrine of the Trinity is a gift to atheist critics.

Wow - Hart is turning into a perfect Ash'ari !

N. T. Wright sounds so erudite and yet actually says so little, if anything at all. Many words merely become camouflage, often hiding heterodoxy.

This is meant to be a satire of post-modern hyperinflated verbiage, right? It's hard to tell because an outsider might wonder if post-modern theology is just such a satire of the theology that preceded it. I'd like to see some quality software evaluate and rank distinct disciplines with a ratio of necessary to unjustifiable gatekeeping linguistic complexity. Anyway, I think...I agree with this gentleman. But who the hell could really say? 🤔

.. DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 - IME POD NEBOM - A NA NEBU??? ========== DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 I nema ni u kome drugom spasenja. Nema uistinu POD NEBOM drugoga imena DANA LJUDIMA PO KOJEMU se možemo spasiti. ----------------- DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 I nema ni u kome drugom spasenja. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Spasa nema od ljudi - osim PO posredniku do Boga Oca YHVH, a TAJ posrednik je G Yehoshua pomazanik. U G Yehoshui je spas! Yehoshua = Od YAHVE dolazi spasenje OD KOGA? OD Yehoshue? NEEEEEEEEEEEE OD Boga Jedinoga Oca YHVH. TKO je spasio mrtvoga G Yehoshuu? Bog Otac YHVH! ------------------- DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 Nema uistinu POD NEBOM drugoga imena dana ljudima ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, TKO je DAO SINA G Yehoshuu - ljudima? Bog Jedini Otac YHVH! TKO je DAO SINU Ime - Yehoshua? Bog Jedini Otac YHVH! ----------------- DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 Nema uistinu POD NEBOM drugoga imena dana ljudima ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, POD nebom! A KOJE je IME NA NA NA NEBU? Ime Jedinog Boga Oca YHVH za Koje sam SIN G Yehoshua kaže u Oče Naš - SVETI SE IME TVOJE!!! ------------------ DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 PO KOJEMU se možemo spasiti. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, PO Yehoshui se može spasiti! ALI - SPAS je OD - Boga Oca YHVH! OD YHVH dolazi spasenje! -------------- DJELA APOSTOLSKA 4,12 I nema ni u kome drugom spasenja. Nema uistinu POD NEBOM drugoga imena DANA LJUDIMA PO kojemu se možemo spasiti. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, PO Imenu Yehoshue, ne OD Yehoshue. Sve je samo OD Jedinoga Boga Oca Jahve. Jedino Bog Otac Jahve može spašavati. TKO je spasio MRTVOGA G Yehoshuu? Bog Jedini Otac YHVH! TKO je DAO TO Ime - Yehoshua - ljudima? Bog Otac Jedini Jahve! POD NEBOM! A TKO je NA Nebu? Jedini Spasitelj - Bog Jedini YHVH. ----------

How can God be bound by time if He is the creator of time?

Consciousness is god; we are all god

Cosmology can contribute to our philosophic understanding of the universe by telling us that the universe is eternal. Eternalism, if true, would lead us to conclude that the universe is eternal and it would not need a creator. Note that an eternal universe does not mean that the universe existed forever in the past.

What rubbish. To answer the question of true anything, the ability to know and reason is obviously important and so we must test the religions to see if they can justify humans having Knowledge and reason, and whether they're ultimately reasonable themselves. This is called a study of epistemology and when it's conducted properly, only the God of Eastern Orthodox Christianity can explain why humans would have Knowledge and reason. Jay Dyer does great work at explaining this and the book The Ultimate Proof by Dr Jason Lisle leads that way, presenting things in a very accessible manner. The talker in this video hasn't the faintest idea about how to distinguish true claims to truth from false ones, and simply relies on arbitrary standards

There is only one truth. To say otherwise would be a statement of one truth that contradicts itself

Bunch of woo woo

"In the Garden" was a cancerous hymn.

Reassuring to read the comments of true and faithful believers that are not deceived by the word plethora of NT Wright culminating in cacophony of discordant thoughts that are unmistakably the work of a misguided theologian.